![]() We envisage an Australian society that provides the structural supports and policies that support good mental health and prevent suicide, and provides equitable, safe and affordable access to the right type of support at the right time. We have a focus on improving the mental health literacy of adults, so they have the knowledge and skills to help children and young people achieve their best possible mental health. To enable this, we provide communities – families, neighbourhoods, educational settings, workplaces and online communities – with evidence-based products and services to support the development of mentally healthy communities and through events and speakers to inspire and motivate others. We envisage an Australia where communities work together to create non-stigmatising, respectful and supportive spaces that support good mental health. We’ll continuously evolve to ensure this information, advice and support are available to those in the greatest need, recognising that social determinants are significant contributors to anxiety, depression and suicide. We leverage current and emerging technologies to provide the community with easy-to-access information and tools, developed in partnership with the community, sector and leading experts. ![]() To enable this, we actively connect people with evidence-based products and services to support improvements in mental health literacy, greater knowledge of prevention and management techniques, and increased confidence to act when they need to. The authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.We envisage an Australia where people have the knowledge, skills and confidence to maintain their mental health and have strategies on hand to respond if they are struggling. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by an NPR contractor. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at for further information. This year, some of the independent candidates are left to hold that debate that the American people may have missed.Ĭopyright © 2008 NPR. It passed before most Americans had a chance to ponder, much less decide, what kind of economic future they want and are prepared to pay for. The financial rescue package was presented as what amounts to putting electric paddles to the heart of a financial system that was about to die. Senators Obama and McCain voted for the same bill, but they would certainly appoint different people to Cabinet posts, the Supreme Court and federal judgeships. And this isn't to say, as George Wallace used to, that there's not a dime's worth of difference between Republicans and Democrats. Well, sometimes, a responsible public official has to dare to cast an unpopular vote. They so vehemently voice their objections, you can forget - no doubt they wouldn't mind if you did - that they actually voted for it. Senators McCain and Obama have no doubt seen all the polls too, and each of them begins defending their vote by demonstrating how angry the bill makes them. Nader favors more government regulation than what's already passed. It guarantees bloated salaries and summer homes for people on Wall Street, while people on Main Street lose their homes and life savings. To Nader supporters, the package is a perilously expensive invoice for taxpayers to rescue the very people who are reckless and greedy. They see it as a move from regulation into government control that destroys the free market, which relies on risk of failure as the most compelling incentive to act wisely. To libertarians, the financial package isn't a rescue but a state takeover of free enterprise. The latest CBS News poll showed 51 percent of Americans opposed to the bill, just 38 percent in favor. The financial rescue package passed by Congress with the votes of both Senators McCain and Obama is not popular. I've already received a few emails from listeners who ask, why do you waste airtime on people who have no chance? But this year independent candidates may have a reason to run they've lacked in other years. Bob Barr, the libertarian, was on last week. We are interviewing the four major independent party candidates for president over the next few weeks. They ask those who may be tempted to vote for a libertarian, a green, a constitution party candidate or Ralph Nader for president, why throw your vote away? They warn, as we get closer to Halloween, that such a vote could actually tip the election to the candidate that scares them most. Major party campaigns for president often belittle independent candidates, especially as the election draws near.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |